FERB Baseline Survey Report – Flood Emergency Response in Bangladesh
Project: Flood Emergency Response in Bangladesh (FERB)
The FERB Baseline Survey documents pre-intervention conditions among flood-affected communities in Khagrachari Sadar and Dighinala Upazilas. Covering 2,082 households/respondents across 40 paras, the assessment establishes baseline evidence on housing and flood damage, WASH, livelihoods, economic recovery and community systems to support project planning, monitoring and future comparison.
Executive Summary
The Flood Emergency Response in Bangladesh (FERB) Baseline Survey was conducted by Trinamul Unnayan Sangstha (TUS) with support from HEKS/EPER Bangladesh to establish the pre-intervention situation of flood-affected communities in Khagrachari Sadar and Dighinala Upazilas. The assessment covered 2,082 households/respondents across 40 paras in Golabari, Komolchari, Merung and Kobakhali.
The baseline identified substantial post-flood challenges affecting shelter, WASH and household economic recovery. Overall, 84.29% of respondents reported some level of flood damage, while 41.98% of houses had not yet been repaired or rebuilt. Drinking-water treatment was extremely limited, with 99.81% of households reporting that they did not treat their drinking water. Only 20.65% of households had a designated handwashing facility. Economic impacts were also significant, with 95.63% reporting decreased household income after the flood.
At the same time, the assessment found strong potential for community engagement, with 83.57% of respondents willing to participate in WASH and livelihood-related meetings. The findings provide an evidence base for FERB intervention planning, targeting, monitoring and future comparison of project results.
Key Findings
• 2,082 households/respondents were covered across 40 paras in four unions of Khagrachari Sadar and Dighinala.
• 84.29% of respondents reported some level of flood damage.
• 41.98% of houses were yet to be repaired or rebuilt at the time of the baseline.
• 99.81% of households reported that they did not treat their drinking water.
• Only 20.65% of households had a designated handwashing facility.
• 95.63% of respondents reported decreased household income following the flood.
• 83.57% expressed willingness to participate in WASH and/or livelihood meetings.
• The findings demonstrate significant interconnected needs related to shelter recovery, safe water, sanitation, hygiene practices and household livelihood recovery.
• Needs and recovery conditions varied geographically, indicating the importance of area-specific intervention prioritization.
Recommendations / Learning
• Prioritize the most flood-affected and unrecovered households using baseline evidence and vulnerability criteria.
• Integrate shelter, WASH and livelihood recovery rather than addressing the identified needs as isolated sectors.
• Strengthen access to safe drinking water and promote practical household-level water treatment practices.
• Increase access to functional handwashing facilities alongside hygiene-awareness and behavior-change activities.
• Support rehabilitation and improvement of sanitation facilities for vulnerable households and communities.
• Prioritize livelihood restoration and income-generating support, considering the very high proportion of households reporting reduced income.
• Apply area-specific programming because the severity and combination of shelter, WASH and economic recovery needs differ across Golabari, Komolchari, Merung and Kobakhali.
• Use the baseline indicators and denominators as the reference point for routine FERB monitoring and subsequent endline/result measurement.
• Utilize the high level of community willingness to participate in WASH and livelihood meetings to strengthen community ownership, Water User Groups and sustainability mechanisms.
• Ensure future monitoring compares project achievements against the established baseline to demonstrate measurable changes in household and community conditions.
